Tuesday, February 27, 2007

What’s Missing from the Anglican Picture


Like millions of others this past week, I’ve read the communiqués and missives and web postings about the latest developments in the Anglican Communion. In the process, I’ve noticed certain elements that are conspicuously absent from the war of words. See if you agree:

  1. Care for those on all “sides.” The Primates’ communiqué proposes an entire structure to care for those in the U.S. Episcopal Church who do not agree with the consecration of a gay bishop. To the extent that they need such care, maybe this is a good thing. But there’s not a word about those who welcome GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered) people in positions of authority. They are no less in need of care, especially in the face of hostility from segments of the Anglican Communion worldwide. Do the Primates assume that the U.S. church’s structure will take care of them? Or is dogma getting in the way of mercy here?
  2. Some explanation of what this is all about. Yes, the controversy is about the role of GLBT people in the church. Clearly, millions of people have deeply held beliefs about this. But people believe things for reasons. And those reasons do not always involve power or control or homophobia or a desire to “get with the times” or the pernicious influence of worldly values. At bottom, I can’t shake the belief that it all comes down to your beliefs about the Bible. Literal truth? Inspired (but sometimes fallible) guide? A book by God or about God? I don’t think we will get anywhere unless we explore the roots of this conflict—and have that debate—in greater depth. Which brings me to:
  3. Honest dialogue. From what I’ve read, most people on every “side” have now given up on dialogue. I see no mention of it in the communiqué, and very little to commend it elsewhere. The only person who seems to be discussing it is the Presiding Bishop, bless her heart.

This last point is particularly worrisome—and not just for the Anglican Communion. The state of honest dialogue, at least in U.S. society, is appalling. People don’t talk; they scream. And they sure as hell don’t listen. I’ve always thought one of the Anglican Communion’s great witnesses to the world has been its reflective, deliberative approach to issues, discussing them in an atmosphere of mutual respect. If we have lost the ability to talk, how on earth can we help the rest of society get its house in order?

We may never agree. But at least we can talk. All it takes is the willingness to start.

No comments: